Filesharing
Mar. 29th, 2005 12:09 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
MGM vs Grokster goes to the Supreme Court. No content on the actual case, but a quote that I though was just brilliant.
"If Grokster is illegal, the Internet is illegal, the postal service is illegal, a room where I can hand you a CD is illegal," he said. "It's not a slippery slope; it's a vertical cliff." -- mp3.com
EDIT: Adding a second and totally pointless RvB quote, because I'd never heard it before.
"So, how exactly would you prepare yourself for the internet?"
"I don't know. Go down to your local middle school chess club and pass out crystal meth and guns, I guess." - Burnie Burns
"If Grokster is illegal, the Internet is illegal, the postal service is illegal, a room where I can hand you a CD is illegal," he said. "It's not a slippery slope; it's a vertical cliff." -- mp3.com
EDIT: Adding a second and totally pointless RvB quote, because I'd never heard it before.
"So, how exactly would you prepare yourself for the internet?"
"I don't know. Go down to your local middle school chess club and pass out crystal meth and guns, I guess." - Burnie Burns
Actual content on the case
Date: 2005-03-29 10:06 pm (UTC)MGM’s answer to this was pretty unsatisfying. They said that at the time the iPod was invented, it was clear that there were many perfectly lawful uses for it, such as ripping one’s own CD and storing it in the iPod. This was a very interesting point for them to make, not least because I would wager that there are a substantial number of people on MGM’s side of the case who don’t think that example is one bit legal. But they’ve now conceded the contrary in open court, so if they actually win this case they’ll be barred from challenging “ripping” in the future under the doctrine of judicial estoppel. In any event, though, MGM’s iPod example did exactly what their proposed standard expressly doesn’t do: it evaluated the legality of the invention based on the knowledge available to the inventor at the time, not from a post hoc perspective that asks how the invention is subsequently marketed or what business models later grow up around it. via some lawyer guy