Re: Second half of reply

Date: 2002-10-28 08:22 pm (UTC)
ext_1310: (wr2)
There's much here that I'd like to respond to, but I'm tired. So,

Min: But we feel movie-verse has a negative connotation in the minds of others, Mitai.

Mitai: In short answer - change that. Write a whole crapload of really stunning fic.


I'd suggest that there *is* a crapload of stunning movie fic out there. Both romantic and non.

The movie created ficwriters. First off, there's no reading in the movie. You're jumping from a fully visual media to a fully written one. (Yes, I realize you 'see' words. You know what I'm talking about. =) That's a hell of a leap. At least with comics you've got a medium that's half-art and half-words. A little easier to transfer from one to the other without losing quite so much in between.

Whoa, whoa, back up the truck.

People have been writing fanfic about visual media since the modern version of fanfic began. Now, you can talk about the new writers, some of whom have never set pen to paper before, sure. But I don't think you can make a blanket statement about the leap from visual to written media. I mean, litfic is *less* acceptable in many places than media fic (and I have my own issues with litfic and authorial ownership etc. that I won't get into now), and while many people who aren't familiar with writing decide to write fanfic, I don't think the medium of the text they're ficcing is really relevant. In fact, I'd say it's *harder* in some cases with text, because there's the issue of trying to write like the original author, which isn't so much the case in media fanfic.


This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 03:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios